I hadn't even gone to bed last night and I read that the assisted suicide report was due out. The bias report written in favour of the idea seems to suggest that some peoples lives are not as valuable as others. It is a worrying thing to think of in isolation, that it could become law to put people down because it was the 'humane' thing to do. (the language use there is intentional).
However, when you combine it with the news from the daily mail this morning that re-enforces the scrounger rhetoric, this time coming from the one person who promised he wouldn't use it (http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/sep/28/ed-miliband-conservative-votes-win) it gets quite worrying. If you get politicians saying things like [the system] "should ‘not pay out before people have paid in’ It implies once again that disabled people are a burden on society and 'sponge' off the state for the lifetime that they are unwell. Not only does the Nazi poster about the burden of disabled people spring to mind, it is important to remember that in fact, DLA is a benefit that enables disabled people to go to work. In addition ESA is costing the tax payer more to implement than it is paying out (or there are certainly a lot of hidden costs such as appeals, medicals, etc etc.).
No comments:
Post a Comment