Whose mental health is more important?

Guest post from an email I received, didn't know what to do about so with permission blogging the story to get it 'out there' any help much appreciated. I am writing this in first person for ease of read.. :)

I live in a council flat, have done for five or so years. Its great here, really quiet, nice neighbours, great location and I'v made it into my safe space and sanctuary away from the world. Well, I guess I need to, after all I have mental health problems, and life gets too much for me. To know I have that space to retreat to gives me some form of stability.

Until tonight that is. This is the third time my neighbours been arguing, really loud. I know they listen to their music loud, and although its pretty distressing, I can cope enough with it or retreat into my other room. However, for the last few months (I cant remember when the first 2 times were) I have heard really loud arguing. The first time I wasn't sure what to do, but after hearing loud thumps like furniture or something I called 999, and it calmed down. The second time it happened it was distressing me and causing me real phyiscal problems (dont want to go into too much detail here) so again called the police

Tonight, a friend was with me, and he was concerned enough so again we called the police. They came pretty quick, we could hear them. Then they rang me on my phone. It was explained to me that this guy was known to the police, they called round often, but there was no one else there and he was shouting at himself. In his attempts to reassure me he distressed me to the point that i dont feel safe in my flat anymore. Aparantly this guy has mental health problems, and was in regular contact with the mental health team, and had been assessed as ok to live in the community. I was welcome to call the crisis team myself, but acording to the police officer there was little they could do beyond that. I was also advised that if I was concerned at all about the loud noise to report it to the noise abatement team (which involves lots of form filling and not much action).

I am at a friends now, they were concerned enough about me staying there and I just want to leave and never go back at this point. I don't feel safe there, and thats no disrespect to my neighbour, but more about the lack of appropiate response from the police when I directly suggested the crisis team. Not only that, Im also concerend about how stable this guy truely is. Its scary to think hes only next door to me, and again not saying anything bad about people with mental health problems, I have enough of my own to be getting on with thanks, without having to worry about anyone elses. Surely I have just as much right to be safe in my own flat as he does to appropiate support and treatment etc. ?? What can I do, in the short term to feel safe, and in the long term. I dont want to leave my flat, I know I could end up somewhere worse, and I am really lucky to hae such a nice flat, but it needs to be safe. and thats just not safe...

Disability, Impairment and sexual identity.

I was on facebook last night, and someone posted this poster above. I have been struggling to get my head around trans, and other LGBT issues until I seen this, and I remmbered something from my course, and all the connections came together, and I really want to share it here, because it now makes sense to me as a disability activist why we should be supporting the LGBT movement and visa versa.

Ok,  so for anyone who doesn't know what the social model of disability is, it is the idea that it is society that disables people and not the impact that their impairment has on them. The social model seperates out the 2, seeing impairment as the medicalised, scientific bit and the disability as socially created, without any link between them. Although there is some arguement about the validity of this amongst academics, the social model is still dominant in the UK, and for the majority it works.

So, there is the social model. Its basically a rejection of science and a stand against it, saying that a person is disabled (and can be enabled) by society, and impairment is irrelevant apart from in a stark medical context.

So, how does this link to LGBT, and trans, and the poster above. Well, as it says on the poster "gender identity is not sexual identity" in the same way that disability academics and disabled people separate and distinguish between disability and impairment, redefining disability out of the body the same is true of LGBT. The separation of the biological "birth" identity and the resultant gender identity is key to understanding this. Although society sees this in the same way as disability and impairment is seen, as no different, there is in fact  a big difference between a persons sexual identity and their gender. 

Gender is a societal concept based and inherently linked to a persons sex. For example gendered clothes, and gendered toilets seek to separate, define and expect people to have the same identity for both. However, as the above poster states, trans people have separated the two identities and reclaimed their gendered idenity from society transforming it into their own concept. You can see this at work in disabiltiy activism, where disabled people reclaim the definition of disability and impairment and recreate it through the social model into a liberating concept. 

I have put a graphic below to help understand what I am saying visually. However, if you want to know more, this paper, which i hope is available elsewhere for free is a really good introduction to it, in a more academic style... http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0968759042000284231

For both disabled people and those who define as LGBT the struggle against societies idea of normal in whatever context whether that is hetronormativity or normativity is very similar. We should celebrate this, and  recognise it more within cross liberation. There are differences between the two, but similarities can only bring unity.

Im resigning from the NUS.

 I am leaving the NUS national disabled students committee. I don't want to go quietly and I want to highlight how inaccessible and disabling my experiences have been with attempting to engage with the campaign. This hasn't been a one off, I am the second person to leave the national disabled students campaign committee because of accessibility issues. When such a big organization as the NUS can not get such basic things right for themselves I get worried for our disabled students who they represent. As always, disabled students are at the heart of everything I do and I will continue to fight for equality for all disabled students. We are entitled to an education. Here is my resigination letter. And to keep it positive, here is my video explaining my role as my unions local disabled students representative. Part time with a full time mission :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-u7NjhB4MI&feature=youtu.be make some noise, I dont want to go quietly.

I remember the national disabled students conference with a great deal of delight. It was the first time I felt properly disabled and properly enabled at the same time. It was a liberating experience, and my recent election to my local unions disabled student rep position made me consider being a part of the national committee.

I remember the speeches from the current committee. If you had the passion and drive to do it, then the small matter of being disabled wasn’t an issue, it was something to be overcome, not a barrier to participation. So I signed up, eager to instigate change and make a difference.

Then there was the fiasco with training being inaccessible which resulted in me not being able to attend and Robyn resigning. I hoped it was a one off and carried on.

When it came to the first meeting I found there were similar access issues that I had to battle with in order for me to get there. Unfortunately, it didn’t appear to just be a one off, but seemed inherent within the organisation.

When I attended my first training meeting I didn’t feel enabled, empowered and activated. I felt overwhelmed, disabled and pretty negative. I didn’t know if this was beyond me, and then the feelings associated with failing came about which just made it worse. I wasn’t sure if it was me or it was genuinely beyond my limitations. I spent Friday and Saturday completely exhausted and unable to function.

What I guess I am saying is that although it might seem ironic, my experience of the national disabled students committee is that it is a very disablist position. In order to meet the demands of the job, students have to have the ability to manage their impairment themselves, and be confident of themselves in their environment. I am not sure what reasonable adjustments and access needs I have, and as these change with every day, and different events it is difficult to pin down exactly what it is that is a barrier that needs to be overcome. I would need to sit and plan every detail in great length to know this, and with only being given 2 weeks’ notice of a meeting this is impossible.

I have spent the weekend not sure what to do, my future with the committee in question. I didn’t feel supported by the organisation to be enabled to attend, and I didn’t find the meeting itself particularly accessible, for me, a physical meeting is not particularly accessible for me in the first place and with no prior notice of the events I could not have forseen what barriers would crop up. For example I can’t read out loud, and I need advance copies of any reading materials as my reading speed is slow, and I like to be prepared. It might seem natural to mention these things, but for me I have so many access needs it would be impossible to write them all down just in case one might be relevant.

And then, this morning, I received a letter from the government. I have been placed in the support group of ESA for a year. It has kind of hit me really hard after the initial excitement of getting the benefit that I am really not well. I leave university in a years time, and I really want to spend this year concentrating on this brave new experience of not being at university, and out in the real world. I need to focus on me, the things I wrote about in the ESA50 form were real, and big things that I need to address in my life. I need to focus on becoming better, doing my degree and work out what I am going to do next. Its only recently that life has become harder for me as I have developed a new impairment that I need to focus on working out whats going on there etc.

I hope you understand that I don’t want to have to do this. However, when I am struggling as an impaired person it is difficult to have a disabled persons identity going alongside. I want to do the best job I can on a local level as my universities disabled students rep. I feel I can make a real difference there, and I think I have worked out that it is where my passions lie. When I am feeling so disabled by my impairment I need to be in enabling environments that reduce my disability so I am only facing barriers caused by my impairment (its a bit complicated I know but I am a complicated person and one who’s studied disability in great detail)

It is with regret that I feel forced to resign from the national disabled students committee, I hope you understand my reasons for this.

Thanks

lucia

Feeling supported...

I got a lovely letter from the DWP this morning. Personalised and everything. No really, they'd put a tick in the support group box and left the WRAG box empty and everything.

But seriously. I went through hell to write in detail about my impairments, and the effect it has on my day to day life, ironically the process itself causing me more problems. I followed guidance, sought help from anyone and everyone who would give it. I answered the form to the descriptors and not the questions.

I wasn't called for a medical with ATOS, despite their targets for getting as many people as possible through their doors. My form was read and considered, and my request to be put in the support group was upheld.

See, there are humans in that place after all.

Today's protest.

I might not have totally agreed with the protests that were happening this week, but I do agree that there is that right to do so, and I respect the people exercising their right. I was unforunately watching the live stream of the carnival like atmosphere outside the DWP head office on live stream when I seen a line of police without warning, provocation or reason storm into the protest from seemingly nowhere causing complete chaos.

What I can't understand is how this happened? It was only afterwards the Met police attempted to find out what was going on via twitter. Surely that should have been the first course of action. Just one look at the hash tag #DPAC or #ukuncut etc. would have led them straight to the heart of the people involved.

What scared me the most was their attitudes towards the protestors. They treated the vertical people as terrorists, despite the fact that the majority of them were probably disabled themselves. I know that if I were to attend an event like that (I don't think it will be possible though) the sudden change in atmosphere, the chaos, and the shoving and screaming and shouting would have probably caused me to collapse and have a seizure. I hope there was no one there today in that position, I was traumatised just watching it unfold. As for those in the wheelchairs it must have been terryfying to be in that confusion. The police came between the line of wheelchairs and the 'rest' of the protestors, literally blocking and barricading them in. To have no way to escape and to be shoved around must have been nasty.

Now I am not saying that these people were innocent disabled people, far from it. Nor am I saying they are above the law, or should be treated differently to other people protesting, if they are breaking the law. However, that being said, I do think that there does need to be some consideration of the people involved in the protest before storming in heavy handed, and if that is the best tactic. Disabled people do have additional needs, and there are important things to be considered. There appeared no order to what the police were doing, and their shouting for the whole group to move back was lost by the second row. It caused too much chaos to be effective.

What shocked me was the difference in the polices attitudes compared with the previous protest that occurred on Oxford street. The police there talked directly to the protesters through loud hailers, and requested people to leave. At that point it gave people who needed to get out for any reason (through impairment or other reason) the opportunity to do so. Those who wished to stay were doing so under the full knowledge that the police had asked them to move.

There were 2 protests today, one outside ATOS and outside the DWP. Apart from the internal part of the DWP protest I can see no difference. There were people standing outside. The only limitation was the space. Outside the DWP there was litterally no space, but there was a square at ATOS. Even if the intention wasn't to block the entrance, but to protest the entrance would have still been blocked.

I just hope that the police are held accountable for their actions today. It was completely inexcusable, and completely avoidable. They gave no warning, no reason and caused a serious ammount of damage. Regardless of any act of defiance, there will be disabled people who will not be able to protest after the events of today, and I am not just talking about the physically disabled people who were injured, but those with mental health problems.

Shame on the police, really shame.

watch it here: http://bambuser.com/v/2946786

today I hate the DWP

I hate the DWP today, or the government, both really. Let me explain...

I have finally been processed for my ESA benefits after claiming ESA since september 2011. I am hopeful for a positive result, but as nothing has come on paper, I am still waiting. So, instead of that nice little portrait the government made of a claimaints journey on ESA where you are nicely assessed by week 13 and all is wonderful I am nearly at week 52 of my claim and waiting, waiting waiting. None of this is my fault.

Now, lets add another complex matter to the equation. My gas and electric bills. Prior to being with my current supplier I was on a benefit tariff, and I always have been on a benefit tarriff, quite happily paying 20 pounds a month to cover my gas and electric. Last summer I stopped claiming benefits (I reclaimed in September) and so switched to my current supplier, who was happy to set up the direct debits at the same amount. Now, remember, I am claiming ESA, so in olden day language I should be not very well (in modern day language I should be dying). I struggle with finances (and detailed this on my form) so I dont really know what month it is, but I am happy that all my direct debits are doing as they should.

Now, a robot should have somewhere picked up I was paying way too little for my energy, but they didn't. Perhaps I should have, but I didn't. Perhaps they should have billed me more than every six months, but they didn't. So here I am, a year down the line with 300 pounds to pay them and no real clue how. They only apply the direct debit discount yearly, which will hopefully take 120 pounds off it.

So, how does me hating the government come into all this?

Well, there is such a scheme called the warm home discount. Basically those people on eligible benefits are entitled to 130 pounds off their energy bills every year. The supplier I was with stipulated that you had to be in the ESA support or work related groups, fair enough.

So I rang them today confident in the knowledge I qualify now, and have done all year, but because of some sort of government error have only just retrospectively become eligible. (I don't have my decision on paper so I am not saying anything here) O no, the scheme closed in February, and you can't apply now, sorry.

So, thanks to the governments failings with my benefits, I am now less 130 pounds. Theres no way I can go back to february and re claim it. I wasn't entitled then. But I am now entitled, and I have been since December. Now I hope you can see why I hate the government so much. None of this is my fault, I just hope I get a bit of money with my ESA award that can be used to pay off the debt (not that I actually needed it for anything, you know.. important)

The week of welfare and disablity stories.

These links don't directly relate to the paralympics, but I am pretty sure thats the reason behind this sudden explosion in the media of all things disability...

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/mark-steel/mark-steel-they-cant-be-disabled--they-can-swim-8084638.html
There's a company called Atos, that you may have heard of, and the achievement it's best known for is to be despised by thousands of the disabled. 

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/28/paralympics-world-of-possibility
A great backwash of enthusiasm from the Olympics will carry the Paralympics triumphantly through the opening ceremony on Wednesday night. It's the same stadium and the same format,

http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/sheffield-s-disabled-join-paralympic-protest-1-4873379#.UD205fzur58.twitter
DISABLED people in Sheffield put on a united front against the government’s chosen Paralympics sponsor.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/aug/28/atos-3bn-government-contracts-paralympics?CMP=twt_gu
Ministers have outsourced more than £3bn of public services to Atos, the multinational IT firm whose sponsorship of the Paralympics has prompted a nationwide campaign by disability activists.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/aug/28/hope-paralympics-games-normalise-disability?CMP=twt_gu
I've been waiting seven long years for the Paralympics. I'm a wheelchair sports fan (it's the same as being an armchair sports fan except I'm more portable).

 http://www.redpepper.org.uk/mythbuster-welfare-reform/
Welfare reform is almost inevitably contentious. Answering the question of who should receive how much financial support relies on often competing conceptions of fairness, with rival views about who needs, and who deserves, our help, not to mention the most just and efficient way of providing it.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/aug/26/tanni-grey-thompson-paralympic-star?CMP=twt_gu
Lady Grey-Thompson may be Britain's greatest Paralympian, a TV personality and a dame of the British empire, but if like her you use a wheelchair, fame and stellar achievement can count for little when confronted with the vagaries of the public transport system.

 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19365786
 Frequent air travel is part of a BBC security correspondent's job - but flying with a wheelchair is sometimes more difficult than it needs to be.

 http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/olympics/paralympics/time-to-embrace-a-new-team-of-heroes-and-rethink-our-attitudes-to-disability-8079299.html
 After a brief dose of reality, it all starts again on Wednesday night. The torch, the ceremony, the fans, the winners and losers and the overnight Team GB heroes.

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/23/paralympians-state-help-disabled-benefits-cut?CMP=twt_gu
 The flames are lit, the torches are on the move. Next week an extraordinary spectacle unfolds, revealing super-fit, finely muscled Paralympians doing things few able-bodied people could ever achieve. But will it change public attitudes – and if so, for better or worse?

 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/paralympic-sponsor-engulfed-by-disability-tests-row-8084799.
 Paralympic sponsor engulfed by disability tests row - Home News - UK - The Independent

 http://blacktrianglecampaign.org/2012/08/28/seven-medals-but-now-the-tories-want-my-benefits-british-paralympic-gold-medalist-tara-flood-speaks-out/

Paralympic winner speaks out and says get Atos out of the Games
Paralympic gold medallist and world record holder Tara Flood faces a test that could see her lose her disability benefits, she told Socialist Worker.