Disability, Impairment and sexual identity.

I was on facebook last night, and someone posted this poster above. I have been struggling to get my head around trans, and other LGBT issues until I seen this, and I remmbered something from my course, and all the connections came together, and I really want to share it here, because it now makes sense to me as a disability activist why we should be supporting the LGBT movement and visa versa.

Ok,  so for anyone who doesn't know what the social model of disability is, it is the idea that it is society that disables people and not the impact that their impairment has on them. The social model seperates out the 2, seeing impairment as the medicalised, scientific bit and the disability as socially created, without any link between them. Although there is some arguement about the validity of this amongst academics, the social model is still dominant in the UK, and for the majority it works.

So, there is the social model. Its basically a rejection of science and a stand against it, saying that a person is disabled (and can be enabled) by society, and impairment is irrelevant apart from in a stark medical context.

So, how does this link to LGBT, and trans, and the poster above. Well, as it says on the poster "gender identity is not sexual identity" in the same way that disability academics and disabled people separate and distinguish between disability and impairment, redefining disability out of the body the same is true of LGBT. The separation of the biological "birth" identity and the resultant gender identity is key to understanding this. Although society sees this in the same way as disability and impairment is seen, as no different, there is in fact  a big difference between a persons sexual identity and their gender. 

Gender is a societal concept based and inherently linked to a persons sex. For example gendered clothes, and gendered toilets seek to separate, define and expect people to have the same identity for both. However, as the above poster states, trans people have separated the two identities and reclaimed their gendered idenity from society transforming it into their own concept. You can see this at work in disabiltiy activism, where disabled people reclaim the definition of disability and impairment and recreate it through the social model into a liberating concept. 

I have put a graphic below to help understand what I am saying visually. However, if you want to know more, this paper, which i hope is available elsewhere for free is a really good introduction to it, in a more academic style... http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0968759042000284231

For both disabled people and those who define as LGBT the struggle against societies idea of normal in whatever context whether that is hetronormativity or normativity is very similar. We should celebrate this, and  recognise it more within cross liberation. There are differences between the two, but similarities can only bring unity.